User talk:John Stutz

Hi John Stutz, the subject of the article you created, John Stutz, does not appear notable enough to be encyclopedic. I've moved it from the main article space to your user space, User:John Stutz, where you are free to continue editing it. --Rory0 96_(block) 08:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intent

I had originally placed the beginning of a bio in this article, but it was marked for speedy deletion before I had time to barely add anything. Soon thereafter, it was moved. I am happy to abide by the decisions of the admins, but I do feel that this article has relevance and is supported by other similar articles in both content and relevance such as here and each of the biographical articles linked to from here and here. With a forthcoming book and additional publication credits, plus widespread acceptance in this industry, I think this article should be considered for the main space.

In light of other support, I have taken the liberty to replace the original [incomplete] bio in an attempt to expand the stub. I do hope this is not considered an unfriendly attempt to subvert the system. More biographical information is coming. John Stutz 16:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a longer reply on the discussion page for your article, but I wanted to repeat the main point here. Please read the policy on Vanity, and the guideline on autobiography. In short, you should not be writing a page about yourself; let others do it. fbb_fan 22:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]