User talk:Joseph Fleisher

List of Fanboy and Chum Chum Episodes

Hi, I'm curious why you blanked the S2 episode information and template. You didn't include an edit summary, so it's difficult to gauge your intentions, particularly when considered against the vandalism that runs rampant on that page. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Fanboy and Chum Chum episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Rich(MTCD)^{Talk Page} 00:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph, I'm still interested to know why you blanked the S2 episode data and template. After I first contacted you, you deleted the director/writer information from Season 1. I'm curious as to why you did that, too. All that information is quality stuff, why are you deleting it? It's verifiable, accurate, useful. Additionally, I would really appreciate if you would please include Edit Summaries. If there's not enough room in the edit summaries to explain your edits, please use the Discussion page. It bothers me when I see good, constructive data deleted without any explanation or rationale. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 23:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai

Stop adding summaries for unaired episodes.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked 1 month for disruption and edit warring. –MuZemike 01:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Note that this block is the result of continued disruption that occurred on multiple IP addresses, several of which were recently blocked for the same thing. –MuZemike 01:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes , please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 12:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Internet Explorer 9, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Pointillist (talk) 11:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Internet Explorer 5, you may be blocked from editing. - Pointillist (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Internet Explorer 9, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fleet Command (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verification

Hi Joseph. I am looking at your contributions to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 8), Mosholu Parkway and Saw Mill River Parkway. The problem here is that I can't tell if your changes are correct. You need to provide references to reliable sources so that these things can be checked. I see that you have racked up quite a few warnings in the past and that does make me a little suspicious but I want to give you the benefit of the doubt. If you can add references to the changes you have made then they can stay. If not then they will need to be reverted within a day or so. If the content you have added actually seems to be false then you can probably expect to be blocked permanently this time. I really hope that this is not the case. Please give me a reason to believe that you are editing constructively now. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Latest preview software release/Opera Mini with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Helpful One 16:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for disruptively adding false information, and failing to communicate. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Pointillist (talk) 21:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]