Your recent edits
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Club winx, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 12:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Know your enemy (Sun Tzu : The Art of War)
My name is Terry Phelps, I know more about these matters than anyone else in the world, and my details can be found in the notes at the end of the review of 'The Bones of the Buddha' at http://buddhistartnews.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/film-review-bones-of-the-buddha-icon-films-2013/#comments. Since this thorny subject appears, at present, to be generating more heat than light, who are you (your real name, that is) and where, may I ask, does your own interest lie in these matters? Without this, you won't get a further syllable from me, I'm afraid. Show yourself. Taphelps (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your prompt reply, and both delighted and relieved to hear that you are not whom I suspected that you may be (hence my question). Whilst Your Piprahwa article mentions that controversy surrounds the finds, it still leans overwhelmingly in support of their authenticity, and this, I feel, does not reflect the necessary impartiality as a result. It should be borne in mind that we are here attempting not only to establish the truth or otherwise of the Piprahwa finds, but also, by implication, the geographical, historical, and perhaps even the physical details of a man - the Buddha - whom billions have regarded as being the greatest human that ever lived, a figure of incalculable imoprtance to World History in fact, and that it therefore behoves us to think it through and get it right. Whilst referring (once) to the source where an opposing view may be found - viz, my own website, 'The Piprahwa Deceptions' - you make no mention of the extent of extraordinary deceptions that are revealed in that source, and this can hardly be to the good. I therefore propose to submit a linking article on Fuhrer which should satisfy the Wikipedia demands, and shall hope that this will be deemed acceptable as a result. Taphelps (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
For Accepting Greetings...!
Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Hi Josh...actually have to say that the things you text me about my new wikipedia corrections is really appreciable and I'm really glad to hear it buddy... I must say that the favour of me about Zoolgy gave me lot of dedication to seek and search about every nook and corner of zoolgy, specially zoological taxonomy. As an undergraduate of Open University of Sri Lanka, it is a pleasure to update new facts about animals to my favourite and the best ever internet pages-Wikipedia- is great..so thank you again about the procedings and hope you and all wikipedians enjoy the articles..I must say that all the facts are real and trustable... I will make all best thing around Sri Lanka..See it..:)..gd luck... ( Gihan Jayaweera)Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
mind ur own business
Tu maghya kan bhabu chu be nija ku? Mu sala jaha kale to bia kan pain khujli heuchi be Randua. To maikinia ku kahibu je mo pakhaa ku asiba, mu taku genhi debi be banda maghya. Ta madharchodh to gandi chatibu. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha adhar patel (talk • contribs) 10:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Afd Antavius Weems
Nomination of Antavius Weems for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antavius Weems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EBY (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Thomas Watters page / Anton Fuhrer page
First, I would like to hear some of those 'various reasons' for deleting the Fuhrer page (and shall assume, of course, that they have no connection whatsoever with the Piprahwa page). Second, I contacted you about the Thomas Watters page (which you have very recently established, I note) NOT about the Fuhrer page, and asked for your comments on a problem contained in Watters' 'Yuan Chwang Travels' book. Thus far you have made none, so I trust that I may now await your reply on this problem accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taphelps (talk • contribs) 15:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)