User talk:Joshtrimble

Notability of FileHippo.com

A tag has been placed on FileHippo.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Goosemanrocks (talk) 02:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Joshtrimble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Graymornings_(talk) 02:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skolem's paradox

Thanks for pointing out that the lede section of Skolem's paradox could stand some improvement. It's good to have new editors helping with the mathematical logic and philosophy articles. If you run into questions or I can help in any way, please let me know on my talk page.

Unfortunately, it isn't permissible under copyright law or scholarly ethics to literally copy from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but we can use them as a source for our articles. There's a short discussion about the lede at Talk:Skolem's paradox. Please feel free to contribute both to the article and the discussion. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]