User talk:Jpalme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Cogntive modules[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cogntive modules, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 10:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

All the problems mentioned above have been rectified by rewriting of the article.

Cognitive modules[edit]


This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cognitive modules, and it appears to include a substantial copy of For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 08:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I've responded to your question on my talk page. — Coren (talk) 06:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
The article at is available under the GNU license, which reslves this problem.
Jpalme 09:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Re : Page numbers and ref macro[edit]

For example, one source can be used,[1] many,[1] many,[1] many,[1] another source in middle,[2] many,[1] many,[1] many,[1] times.[2] Hope that helps.[1][2] :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 12:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Source one citation goes here
  2. ^ a b c Source two citation here

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)