User talk:JuliaHavey1
IF Rhode Island Red comments on this page, it will be considered the "one more time" mentioning me or contacting me violation of my DEMAND to be left alone by him. I am VERY serious about this stalking cease and his harassment of me stop NOW!
Hello. If you feel that you are being stalked, please make sure to contact an the Arbitration Committee or the Volunteer Response Team. —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 16:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Let me rectify that...[edit]
I noticed you and User:Rhode Island Red seem to be in a bit of a dispute over what seems to be a case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please don't take it personally. He may have accidentally picked up your edits as similar. It seems this account is fairly new. There doesn't seem to be any contact from him to this talk page at all. Therefore, you may be referring to contact he made with a previous account of yours. Please discuss any issues you two may have at the Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents. Thanks. —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 16:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
June 2010[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 17:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)I have every right to protect myself from this editor, RIR. He continually mentions me or infers to me in his edits despite being told NOT to do so. I do not edit, I realize I am banned by I am honest, used my real name so as to NOT attempt to break any rules when posting the information about this persons harassment/stalking of me! I don't need nor want to be 'unblocked'. I want to be protected from RIR who seems hell bent on using me/my name in his arguements. There is NO reason for it. HE is the one in need of reprimanding and no one seems to do it. He violates admin direct 'orders' NOT to edit Juice Plus and nothing happens. He continues to mention me, or in the most recent case, insinuate at tie to me to an edit he was reverting. It's ridiculous and has to stop!
I do not think there is need to block me, if one looks at the history, you will see my edits were only to get the attention of admin that Rhode Island Red was again engaging me by using my name in his edits. However, I do not mind if I remained blocked as I don't intend on editing. I would however like to be able to email or speak w/ someone regarding inaccuracies on my BLP, Julia Griggs Havey, and updated information. Is there a way that I can get a message to Risker who has a particular interest in maintaining the accuracy of BLP content. Thank you. I can be emailed out of wiki at julia at inlink dot com thank you!
Your request for Request for Clarification of an Arbitration Committee ruling[edit]
Hello JuliaHarvey1 - As there is no Arbitration Committee ruling that relates to yourself, the Juice Plus article, or any other user editing that article, I am sorry to advise you that your request will be removed from the page. The Arbitration Committee cannot clarify a ruling that it has not made. I urge you to consider contacting info-en-q@wikimedia.org to discuss your concerns. Thank you. Risker (talk) 18:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC) (Member of the Arbitration Committee)
Speedy deletion of Template:Julia Havey[edit]
A tag has been placed on Template:Julia Havey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 18:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)