User talk:Juliamarriott

This user is a student editor in IES_Abroad_Barcelona/The_Climate_Crisis_-_Global_Perspective,_Mediterranean_Context_(Spring_2024) .

Welcome!

Hello, Juliamarriott, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recycling processes in the textile industry

Hi @Juliamarriott, I moved your contribution, Recycling processes in the textile industry, back to your sandbox for a number of reasons. The main one being your article has no inline citations, which makes it difficult for readers to verify factual statements in your article. Every statement should be followed by a supporting citation; if a group of sentences are all supported by the same source, you can place a single reference after all of them, but you need to have at least one reference per paragraph, and you shouldn't have any statements after the final reference in a paragraph. If you need a refresher on how to add citations, please consult this training module.

WP:NOTESSAY Writing Style: Currently, the article reads completely like a persuasive essay, which is fine for other assignments in your course but not for Wikipedia. You have to keep in mind, Wikipedia is not a place to publish your ideas or conclusions about a topic. That’s considered “original research,” and is not allowed on Wikipedia. This means your writing for Wikipedia will summarize what independent, reliable, secondary sources have said about a topic, so that a Wikipedia reader can get an overview of the current thoughts and understanding of that topic. Remember, the goal is to provide a neutral, fact based summary of the topic at hand based off the reliable sources you've found, not to persuade the readers. I recommend reading over pgs. 7-9 of Editing Wikipedia before you rewrite to check out some examples of what is appropriate prose for Wikipedia. Looping in @Bcndz5. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]