User talk:JulianaRios11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome![edit]

Hello, JulianaRios11, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

General info[edit]

Whose work are you reviewing?

JulianaRios11

Link to draft you're reviewing
Draft
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Current

Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]

Hi there! I love film photography so I found your topic to be especially fascinating, looking forward to your final product! Below is my peer review:

Lead

I like how you condensed the lead in comparison to the current version. You made the intro more to the point and gave the reader an over all gist without getting too bogged down in detail! The only suggestion I had would be to maybe consider adding a brief description of cross processing in artistic practice since that's one of your major sections later on.

Content

While I don't know much about this topic, it seems like all the content there is relevant! I like how you included notable works for cinematography. I'd be really interested in hearing more about the history behind cross processing!

Tone and Balance

The tone of this article seems pretty neutral to me! Perhaps expansion on the cross processing in artistic practice section might help balance it out with the processes one!

Sources and References

You've done an amazing job expanding on the references for this article, adding in citations when necessary and appropriate. It looks like there might be some things missing from citations 4 and 5 (?) though I'm not entirely sure what the red coding means. If you're unsure about that too maybe asking Professor Champion?

Organization

The article so far is sorted nicely and flows in a logical way! Keep it up as you expand more.

Overall

I think you're off to a great start with editing this article! You've touched up the logistics and added a section that adds value to this concept. My biggest suggestion would be to just expand! I'd love to read more about cross-processing, especially since I don't know a lot to begin with, and I feel like a lot of others will too :) DionnaTaylor (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review from Prof. Champion[edit]

Hi, LMK when you'd like a peer review from me on this; from our previous conversation I think it's still a work in progress and not 100% ready for review? Kaylea Champion (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]