User talk:Justinmeister

You have recently created the article Tom Hess. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

I see you have already been contacted about recreating this material. Please see our guideline at WP:MUSIC. Mr. Hess seems to fail the guideline. Please do not recreate the article. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homo erectus

What would be the problem if a 9th grader wrote the article? that was a poor comment to leave on the cleanup list, you would have been better off just putting the template on the page and not noting it on WP:cleanup. If you have a problem with someone's style, fix it and offer them feedback for how to improve, rather than shooting them down (even with a generalisation). Ga rr ie 01:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note on my page. Looking at the history of both the article and the talk page it looked like you had left that comment. Sorry if that was not the case. Ga rr ie 22:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patton Creek Shopping Center

I have posted a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patton Creek Shopping Center arguing that there are significant differences among different shopping malls. You may want to reply there. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Talk:Censorship

I honestly have no idea how your edit got deleted. I only intended to remove some trolling comments that were much higher up on the Talk page. I did that last night as a section edit so it should not have even been possible to affect your comment since it was so much farther down the page. I think this might have just been a database hiccup but you have my sincere apologies anyway. I have replaced your comment on the page. Rossami (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hendrix article

I found the first three subsections to be written in a unencyclopedic tone, it's written like it's a book (a skim through the sections and you'll see what I mean). If you could copyedit these sections and remove the words that make it sound like it's a book, that'd be great :) HK51 21:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental deletion of comment

Hey, buddy, you kind of stepped on me at talk:Law of supply and demand. I restored my comment after yours, so "no harm, no foul". Take care! :-) --Uncle Ed 22:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Justinmeister. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]