User talk:J~enwiki/Archives/2009/May

Saturn Corporation

Ok, I was about to revert those also by myself, its like crystallballing... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Typ932 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 4 May 2009

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mount St. Mary's College.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Mount St. Mary's College.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mount St. Mary's College, seal.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Mount St. Mary's College, seal.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Just wanted to say

Hello, I just wanted to say I enjoyed our little "debate" on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levi Johnston. Your arguments were certainly well thought out and on-topic. Hopefully I came away form it a bit wiser. :)

In regards to the other articles you mentioned in the AfD, I do feel that Mary Jo Kopechne shouldn't have her own article. Jessica Lynch is a bit harder to say since there is no obvious alternate place to put the content. I didn't say this on the AfD since it wasn't relevant, but I thought you might want to know.

See you around, --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Michael Flood

Thanks for your cleanup job here - it's improved by orders of magnitude over what it was this morning! Rebecca (talk) 04:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

ThankSpam

My RfA Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC) ~~~~~

Well, back to the office it is...