User talk:Kalupinka

Welcome!

Hello, Kalupinka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chess Diagram

Can you recheck your edit here. You said "version 1.15 clear layout from pointlessly nested tables AND divs", however ever since that date it seems there have been various problems with the display of the chess diagram in complex situations. For example when two boards are used together and being displayed in Firefox. It seems the 'pointlessly nested tables AND divs' did in fact do something to ensure it could work in such cases, however at this stage I'm not knowledgable enough to know for sure. Perhaps you could review your edit if you feel you have sufficient understanding of use of nesting and divs. ChessCreator (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ethnic groups in Serbia

Hi.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AEthnic_groups_in_Serbia&diff=236214888&oldid=232761100

Are you aware of Wikipedia:Line break handling, especially Nowraplinks shortcomings..? Sardanaphalus (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

{{unblock|Kalupinka is the good friend of mine and certainly not any giant sockfarm.}} —Guy Peters ^{Talk • Contributions • Edit counter} 18:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Requests for unblocking need to be made by the blocked user. —Travis ^talk 18:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kalupinka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requests for unblocking cannot be made by the blocked user since Kalupinka has been banned to edit even own talk page.

Decline reason:

No valid reason for unblock given. — Aitias // discussion 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You see, I was blocked so thoroughly that I can't even edit my talk page - except anonymously (so kindly don't block this IP, it's a public library). Which means problems with proving this is really me, so I wanted to try having the first request signed. And no, sending emails was no good.

OK, let's go again:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kalupinka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is woefullly complicated, but should not take more than 5 minutes of your time (while I have been blocked for quarter a year, so do take the time before you click):

I (and another unfortunate) was blocked as a part of some "giant sockfarm" sweep. That involved several accounts with truly suspicious similar names, created shortly before and used just for one edit. However, I have a long and full editing history both on my home account cs:user:Kalupinka and here since early 2007, have never been involved in any conflict, let alone conflict resolution process, and don't think I ever even saw whatever page that edit war was about.

So, to reiterate, this is some crazy mistake and a great miscarriage of admin privileges; the sooner we are allowed again to improve Wikipedia, the better.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, only a checkuser or arbitratormay investigate the claims you make above. Your best recourse is to email a member of the arbitration committee directly and ask for a personal review of your case. The arbitration committee's page is at WP:ARBCOM and there are listed current email addresses for active arbitrators. Simply pick one with a friendly sounding name, email them directly, and ask for a review of this case. Jayron32.talk.contribs 15:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BTW, you might want to declutter your sigs as shown above.

Kalupinka --195.113.180.197 (talk) 13:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]