User talk:Kareeser/Archive 2

	Welcome!
	Welcome to my discussion page! I appreciate any and all comments, and would love to hear from you, especially if I can improve myself in some way or another. I appreciate feedback, so be bold on this page just like any other page!
	Archive 1 (October 10 to February 6)	Current Discussions	Archive 3 (November 11 to November 6)

Hi Zanimum! Re: TTC Subway Stations

As a relative newbie to Wikipedia, one of my first couple edits were of the TTC subway stations that I most use, that is: Islington, Kipling, and St. George.

While looking through the entire transit line articles, I noticed you uploaded some nice photos for Old Mill at night. I myself uploaded photos for Kiping and Islington subway station, and was wondering, if you still live in the area, if you were interested in supplying all TTC stations with a photo or two. =)

Secondly, I noticed that you released your photos under public domain. As I am very unfamiliar with licensing of images, I simply copied the licence for the pictures on the "St. George" page, which was {{GDFL}}. I was wondering what the difference was, and if personal photos of government property can actually be listed under GDFL!

Thanks! Kareeser|^Talk! 04:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
P.S. You can reply here or at my talk page, I'll check both =)

Hi Kareeser! I might be able to do this eventually, especially if there is a college strike, as anticipated. The fact it's on government property is fine, unless you're trying to make a profit off them. Actually, the best way to upload photos is to put them on "Wikimedia Commons". This essentially allows any Wikimedia project in any language to access the same file of the photo, instead of each uploading a different copy of the same file. My personal favourite, and one of the best licenses to go with is {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}. It gives people multiple licenses to work with, and unlike PD, is legal is all countries. (PD images by living people are not recognized as being so in some foreign countries. That not to say it's illegal, and you be arrested if you travel there! It's just that they don't recognize it as actually legal.) -- user:zanimum</nowiki>

Reply

Ah, I see now. It's just that I've heard the term "Chahar-Aimak" and thought that they were the same people. Thanks for removing them. --Khoikhoi 02:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Hehe. No problem. --Khoikhoi 02:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot

Hello Kareeser! Thank you so much for awarding me with the barnstar! I'm really flattered! :-) --hede2000 23:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

NFL Coaches

Hi Kareeser, I overheard your message on User talk:Phbasketball6 and reverted the problematic edits to Template: NFL Coach and Mike Sherman. Let me know if there are any lingering problems. ×Meegs 02:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Comment Regarding Fake titles of nobility

Thanks for notifying me. I'll remember to check the history next time. JSIN 05:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

But a Prescriptive Barony, by definition, is not a fake title, and there's little, if any information about fake titles in the article. The current Fake titles of nobility seems okay, in my opinion. JSIN 05:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Billy and Mandy update

Sorry I wasn't more specific. There were two entries about the episode "The Love That Dare Speak Its Name/Major Cheese", the second one omitted the first word "The." I know I should have done a redirect, but I got lazy. Sorry! Konczewski 23:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for that edit to Bispham, Blackpool. It's nice to know that someone is making sure I'm not messing up. :P. (I'm glad you don't think you're a newbie anymore. ;)) Ck lostsword|^queta! 17:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

I've put a thanks to you for the talk page design - seemed the polite thing to do. ;). I've also tidied up your archive link a little. Feel free, as always, to change it back. Ck lostsword|^queta! 10:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

No problem. And it's really clever in the actual archive - I suspect I will nick that when it comes to be time for me to archive. ;) Ck lostsword|^queta! 16:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for looking out for me - again. Revolting colour - I'm perfectly happy with white, but I should work on the layout for the top. :D Ck lostsword|^queta! 21:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

AfD for Slashdot effect

Hey, thank you for responding so zippily to the AfD, and for politely and reasonably considering the information presented. You clearly acted in good faith, and I hope you'll continue to nominate articles for consideration. AfD is about community input, precedent, and cleanup -- we don't just nominate articles certain to be deleted, and every nomination means a little more thought has gone into our content :)

Adrian~enwiki (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Er, hi!

Hi! I'm the you were debating with on Billie Joe Armstrong...I took your suggestion and made an account.  : ) Starla Dear 18:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the warm welcome! Those links really helped. I've definitely improved my user page... Starla Dear 23:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

reply

thanks so much!  :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lbr123 (talk • contribs) .

Billie Joe Armstrong

Yeah, that's a bunch of junk. Country music? Billie Joe? Come on! That's like saying Kenny Chesney is rock. The only example I can think of is The White Stripes. On every one of their albums they have a song that does sound rather country ("Hotel Yorba", "Little Ghost", "Well It's True That We Love One Another"), but that doesn't make them country musicians, and it isn't enough to state country as one of the genres they fit in. My point: One different song doesn't make a difference, especially when you look at all the songs Billie Joe has written. And I have a question...I'm assuming that Minnesota Girl is about Adrienne, and supposedly it was written before Green Day was formed. But that doesn't make sense, because Billie Joe meant Adrienne at a Green Day concert. I could be wrong, but I don't think there were any other Minnesota Girls in his life. Just thought I should mention it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starla Dear (talk • contribs)

Sorry. I was a little excited. But yeah, I do totally agree with you. Starla Dear 01:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Name change

Hello. I am both [a name] and Psychok. I created the Psychok username in order to reserve a known name because I would like to change my [a name] username (I'd rather not have my email address being scraped). Can you consolidate the two accounts into just this one? TIA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Psychok (talk • contribs) 18 April 2006 (UTC)

.

Response to your question about SATP vs STP

See my response at Talk:Standard_conditions_for_temperature_and_pressure to your question about SATP vs STP. - mbeychok 01:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Titration.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Titration.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wwagner 22:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Age of Empires III

Hi Kareeser. Shame I've been away for a while, really. I noticed that AoE III had been taken over by minor editors who make 'negative contributions' then argue fiercely that they should be included. (We had one last night - gold/coin *sigh*). I read through the article, and had no idea where to go with it. I knew there were problems with it, but I couldn't see what we could do to fix them. Peer review was the best thing - and they seem to have pointed out of the things that we noticed. I know it seems tricky at the moment, but at least now we have an external peer review that we can point to if (or when?) we have the inevitable arguments :D. I would love to see AoE III become if not an FA then at least GA standard. I believe that by being peer reviewed we can move in that direction. At some point after we have done what we can, I will submit the article for copyediting and other community clean-up tasks (sounds like some sort of punishment). I hope you agree with everything that I am trying to do, because this task requires the work of more than just me. Thanks. Ck lostsword|^queta! 09:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Dutch mine gathering rate

Kareeser,

I'm assuming you have either an older version, or maybe some mod pack to your AOE 3 because it is known that the gathering rate for mines for the the dutch settlers has increased by 15%.

The following link is a quick guide to the most current patch(1.08): http://forums.heavengames.com/redir/http%3A//aoe3%2Eheavengames%2Ecom/downloads/getfile%2Ephp%3Fid%3D888%26dd%3D1%26s%3Deb5c68998ef9589b7b741240aeac0f16

If you have any doubts, you can also go to ageofempires3.com and put a question in the forum and you will see that the aoe community will respond with this knowledge.

improper integral

Hello. You seem to have missed a major point of the article titled improper integral. The fact that one of the bounds of integration is infinite, as in

$\int _{0}^{\infty }{dx \over 1+x^{2}},$

DOES NOT imply that the integral cannot be defined except as the limit

$\lim _{b\to \infty }\int _{0}^{b}{dx \over 1+x^{2}}.$

The article is quite explicit about that. It says that

• In some cases the integral can be defined without taking such a limit, but can be conveniently computed only by taking such a limit, and gives this very integral, from 0 to ∞, as an example of that.

It also says that

• in some cases the integral cannot even be defined except as such a limit, and it gives a different example.

Michael Hardy 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

I realize you didn't write the article, but you did appear to be the person who wrote "See Figure 2" right at the place where that would give exactly the wrong impression. Michael Hardy 18:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)