User talk:Kdkatpir2

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Look!

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Nope. Just more evidence that User: TREYWiki and his "buddies" have no life. Kd lvr 18:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC) P.S. David, they accused you of being a meatpuppet OF YOURSELF! *HA*

You Won't Believe This

It's Tom. Look at the last few comments on[[1]] also go to those users talk pages. Kd lvr 23:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

It's Tom again. This has just come out. [[2]] Kd lvr 15:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

If you suspect this user of sock puppetry, please see the following: [[3]].

Kd lvr 01:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 23:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stacy Smith

A tag has been placed on Stacy Smith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Strangerer (Talk) 06:52, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

KDKA stuff

It appears many people have issues with what you do on Wiki. I'd suggest you refrain from editing KDKA unless you really know what you're talking about -- and it appears you do not. --Write_On_1983 talk | contribs 01:44, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kristine Sorensen. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. MaxSem 17:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't remove stuff

The CBS 2 section of KDKA-TV was marked as unreferenced for a reason -- no information is cited. Don't remove it! --Write_On_1983 talk | contribs 18:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Warning

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Write_On_1983, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

--TREYWiki 20:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. --TREYWiki 21:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

HI

Hi, my name is George. Ive seen some of your edits, and I was wondering what your name was. I think we could be wiki-friends =) 71.116.18.135 18:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, my name is David. What is your reason for asking and what is your wiki name? Kdkatpir2 18:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Dude....you sent that from THE SAME IP YOU'RE USING!!!! *laughs hysterically* Give it up. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 18:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me, I did nothing of the kind. You are making my friend and myself seem as if we are criminals! I'm not telling you again: this must stop at once!!! --Kdkatpir2 19:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC) P.S. What does IP mean?

OK...whatever. IP = Internet Protocol. Look it up, while you still can. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 19:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

What you are doing, making the many accounts (is sockpuppetry) but is not verging on vandalism. User:WTAEchick....I don't think so. Stop now or you will be put on the vandalism board. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 18:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

That page was made on Thursday the 26. I havn't made any changes on that page. That page is from an aquaintence of mine.

Oh please, stop. This is almost not funny anymore. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 18:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

All of these socks he claims are "friends or co-workers" etc. This is getting old. He is in Erie? Erie dosent even get KDKA so he is making up all that KDKA stuff/copying it off the website--TREYWiki 19:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

All the IP addresses and websites come off the Verizon server in Erie (according to WhoIs). He could be in a suburb or Erie, but I would say within 10 miles of Erie proper. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 19:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Who is in Erie? What are you talking about? Kdkatpir2 19:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

You are. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 19:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I am not in Erie!!! I am a resident of Herminie, Pennsylvania. I get KDKA by cable and antenna NOT Erie. Quit it with the lies now!!! Kdkatpir2 19:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry dude, you are in Erie. Also, you wouldn't need an antenna for KDKA if you were in Westmoreland County. You could get it with a set of rabbit ears. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 19:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I have had enough! This is nonsense! STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW EVERYTHING! You do not live in this house, so you DO NOT know ANYTHING about local picture quality! Kdkatpir2 19:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

give it up. YOU HAVE BEEN UNCOVERED! seriously we all know. everyone knows. --TREYWiki 19:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Where the heck have you been getting your information? I'M NOT TELLING YOU AGAIN QIUIT IT WITH LIES NOW!!!!!Kdkatpir2 19:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Dude, I can get KDKA with a pair of rabbit ears in Morgantown, WV. KDKA has one helluva signal, in Westmoreland County, which is right next door to Alleghany County (Home of Pittsburgh) you could use rabbit ears. But that doesn't matter cause YOU ARE IN ERIE. I get my information from WhoIs. Easy website to use. OK....I need a Pepsi and a tylenol. Tylenol for you Trey? - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 19:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, good for you, but I think I know where I live and THAT'S IN HERMINIE And BTW when I said antenna that's exactly what I mean-- Rabbit ears!!!!!Kdkatpir2 19:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, see, rabbit ears are rabbit ears, an antenna is the damned thing on your roof. There is a BIG difference. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 20:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with Wikipedia. you and you little "Tray" will do or say anything, no matter how stupid it sounds to make it seem like we are doing something wrong. Now that you have realized that Tom and I are different, you will pick out the smallest detail and try to make us seem like criminals. This is rediculous and it has got to stop! Kdkatpir2 20:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Right....right, we are doing wrong when you are breaking many Wikipedia rules, going around and "acting" like you are two seperate people (ha!) and putting the whole project at risk by uploading copyright protected images and logos. Right and we are the ones who are doing wrong. Read what you write before you hit that save button. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 20:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh and his name is Trey...not "Tray". Don't act like you're 5. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 20:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Sock puppetry negative

As the sock puppetry accusation was returned as a negative[4] please remove the tag from your user page. KP Botany 01:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

You might want to ...

...have a look at WP:MEAT to see what we mean. I quote:

A related issue occurs when multiple individuals create brand new accounts specifically to participate in, or influence, a particular vote or area of discussion. This is common in deletion discussions or controversial articles. ...

These accounts are often described as "meatpuppets", a name perhaps inspired by the band of the same name. They are often difficult to distinguish from real sock puppets and are treated similarly. Neither a sock puppet nor a single-purpose account holder is regarded as a member of the Wikipedia community. (emphasis mine) The Arbitration Committee has ruled that, for the purpose of dispute resolution, when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sock puppets, or several users acting as meatpuppets, they may be treated as one individual. (emphasis mine)

It is considered highly inappropriate to advertise Wikipedia articles in order to attract users with known views in an attempt to strengthen one side of a debate. It is also considered inappropriate to ask friends or family members to create accounts for the purpose of giving additional support.

That's why we've been so jumpy with you and your two friends--you guys are treading on a very thin line here--one that could get all three of you booted off Wikipedia. For your sake, you three are advised to be very careful. Blueboy96 18:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Why???

Why IN THE WORLD would I be a meatpuppet of myself. You really need to think about what you are posting before you post something stupid like that. Kdkatpir2 22:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

QUIT..

SCREWING AROUND. YOU ARE JUST LOOKING FOR FAULTS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO LIFE. Okay.Kdkatpir2 20:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually, we are not. You are being punished for doing exactly what we told you to stop doing. Being a sock/meatpuppet. You got busted, you are now blocked indefinitely and that block ain't coming off anytime soon. Now, I suggest to you that you stop vandalising on your User:Kd lvr account and consider taking a nice, long wikibreak. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 20:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Patrice King Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrice King Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrice King Brown (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)