User talk:Kelthicum

Edit warring on Regnum Online

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Regnum Online. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Spa c explosion ^[talk] 16:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Regnum Online. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Regnum Online with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Regnum Online with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Regnum Online

Everything I tried to post in that page is absolutely true and veryfiable. The other person who is deleting my changes and replacing them for his text is obviously someone from NGD -the company behind Regnum Online-. I tried to post those changes just to give the possible customers an impartial and sincere view of the game as it is actually and not a propaganda talk as they do. If you think this is wrong, then I am going to doubt about the quality of Wikipedia. Thank you for your time.--Kelthicum (talk) 21:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to ask you for your comment on this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelthicum is is wrong, then I am going to doubt about the quality of Wikipedia. Thank you for your time.--Kelthicum (talk) 21:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) There is not one editor reverting you, but a total amount of three (Myself included). The content is removed on the basis that the edit is not sourced with reliable sources, and because it doesn't adhere to WP:NPOV. The added content is equally not a fact, but rather an opinion - for example, the overpowered part is a judgement regarding the games item shop. If i would say item shop items are underpowered, that would equally be a judgement, and thus an opinion. Criticism and opinions are not bad per sé, but they need to be a majority vision, and require a reliable source to back them up. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How to delete a Wikipedia account

Can you tell me how to delete my account? Thank you in advance.--Kelthicum (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts cannot be deleted - you are, however, free to stop editing at any one point. You could, however, change your password to a scrambled one so you cannot access the account again. Another option is WP:RTV, but that is unlikely to be worth the hassle. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 14:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]