User talk:Kenada53
Your edits to Crossing midnight
[edit]Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Kenada53! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 12:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Game Sector
[edit]Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. --Drat (Talk) 11:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted your restoration of the link on the Shivering Isles page as most of those screenshots are available on the official site, and in much higher resolution. Your site has little more than screenshots and cheats, with very brief news items on the main page. Per WP:EL, your site doesn't add much of a unique resource, as when (or if) the articles reach featured status, they would have sufficient screenshots, and regardless of quality, we don't need cheat links. The trivially short nature of the news means there is little encyclopedically useful info to be gleaned.--Drat (Talk) 10:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Stop reverting my edits blindly, as you are often reverting vandalism back in. Your edit to my page only confirms you to be a vandal yourself.--Drat (Talk) 08:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to 28 Weeks Later
[edit]Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in 28 Weeks Later. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 18:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- I removed the link because it was clearly not mainstream media, but instead a personal website that has no place in the External links, especially when alternative links like the one to Yahoo! that I just added are easily available. Hope you understand. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 18:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Image galleries
[edit]Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.--Drat (Talk) 10:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crossing midnight.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Crossing midnight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)