Jump to content

User talk:Kensai1824

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kensai1824, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  JHMM13 (T | C) 08:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for experimenting with the page Danyelle Sargent on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. JHMM13 (T | C) 08:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Danyelle Sargent. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. JHMM13 (T | C) 08:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

asianjunkie.com

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Hu12 12:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

God forbid somebody who likes one of the celebrities might actually want to find pictures of her. If that's the case, why have external links at all? By its very inclusion, somebody's site is being promoted, is it not? What makes those sites different? What makes the other galleries different? You're quick to finger me for "spam" but would it be any different if 12 different users added links to my site independently? I don't see why. It's the same thing, spreading the word.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kensai1824 (talkcontribs)

Please read this: Adding a link to the top of an unordered list. This is an A-number-1, red-flag, hot-button spam sign. It suggests that you want people to look at your link FIRST FIRST FIRST! You wouldn't butt in at the head of a queue; don't put your link first. All your edits this year were adding links to a gallery at the top of the current external link, a behavior defined as spamming. Instead of adding links to galleries, why don't you try to obtain free images that can be uploaded at Wikimedia Commons so that all projects can use them? -- ReyBrujo 16:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to move it to the bottom, I don't really care. Obviously that was not the problem you had with it, right? Or else you could have just let me know and I would have done it for you. If it's okay to put it at the very bottom or 50 lines below the last external link or wherever YOU want, let me know because i'll do so.

Why not save all the pictures and upload it to a wikimedia commons page? Why don't people just take all the information from the official sites and update the celebrity pages daily? Because it requires a huge amount of effort. Is it easier to download 150 pictures and then upload them or is it easier to just link a gallery? That's why people link sites in the external link category. The category is there for a reason and it's easier. Let me know if it's okay for me to add links to the galleries on whatever sites I find. Otherwise, i'm not going to waste my time bantering about this because it would be pretty pointless if i'm never going to make progress in the first place. Thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kensai1824 (talkcontribs)