User talk:Khomaniak

September 2014

Hello, I'm JudeccaXIII. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Barnabas without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JudeccaXIII (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnabas

I know you explained I just don't have enough proper warning options. The real reason why I reverted your edit because you removed sourced information. This was a first warning message. I'm not trying to be harsh, Im just following the rules...mobile edit -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1)There is nothing mentioned about a Bible found by the Turkish in the Alleged writing section. 2) Just because the article's format- style is wrong dosn't mean delete the information. 3) The source is good, and the header can be change or the info can be moved in a section that seems best. The only reason left on why you removed the information is the information itself. -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What's not newsworthy is a matter of opinion. What you believe about the information provided on articles is bogus is your own view. Simply this, you don't like it because the info is not up to your stand-out standards. That's not being constructive on Wikipedia. -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You know that Barnabas isn't the same as the article Gospel of Barnabas. You should have clarified that early, but now I finally know. -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]