User talk:KontestLead

Heya

Please do not delete other people's questions from Wikipedia's help desk. Your question will be answered in due time by volunteers. Please be patient. --Jayron32 01:06, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for every edit being an attack, nasty, confrontational or some combination thereof. In short, user has only engaged in disruptive editing.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KontestLead (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia policy says that I have to be given a warning. I was not given a warning. KontestLead (talk) 01:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits were sufficiently obnoxious that no warning was called for. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually policy says "However, note that warnings are not a prerequisite for blocking." In your case, the fact that your intent is to cause disruption is plain from your edits.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3], [4], and especially [5] were patently disruptive, and you well knew that. –MuZemike 01:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]