I Korval, I appreciate very much your work in the page C++0x. It start as an simple redirect to C++ and subsequently as an horrible translation of a part of my thesis. But now, thanks to contributions of the community, is a very nice article and a lot of people find it very useful. Thanks --Gildos (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of CEGUI
I have nominated CEGUI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEGUI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Gamma correction image
I noticed that you reverted my image on the Gamma correction page. Your comment, "the new image is much uglier, and renders poorly" is not exactly forthcoming as to the problem with the image. I spent considerable time and effort ensuring that the new image would match the old one very closely. With the exception of the choice of font (which is beyond my control, as it is an SVG image), I'm interested to know what in particular is "much uglier" and "renders poorly" about it? Korval (talk) 04:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have phrased that more nicely. Yes, it’s just the font that’s uglier: the SVG file uses helvetica, but Mediawiki apparently won’t render Helvetica, and whatever it chooses as an alternative is awful. I'll try to cook up an alternative right now. –jacobolus (t) 05:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to C++14 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- However, C++11 constexpr functions could only contain a single expression that is returned (as well as <code>static_asserts</code> and a small number of other declarations.
Please explain your revert of my revert of C++14. I can find no sources mentioning anywhere that C++14 was released on December 15, 2014. You said "The reference was already sited from the iso.org site.", but that's not true AFAICT — none of the references in the lede paragraph (1, 2, 3) mention that date in any way. If you're referring to a different reference I'm missing, please add an appropriate <ref> tag. Thanks, AlphaPyro (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC).
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)