User talk:Krish121

April 2021

Hello Krish121. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Krish121. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Krish121|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No i am not a paid for this i just wanted to contribute this page. Krish121 (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to CarryMinati. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Objective prose that makes unsourced promotional claims and original research for promotional purposes is also unacceptable. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 14:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You claim that you are not paid to promote CarryMinati on Wikipedia. Even if you are not being paid, you may still not use Wikipedia as a promotional tool. Since all your edits to Wikipedia have been advertising, adding hype and promotional fluff about CarryMinati, you obviously have a conflict of interest. Thus, you are asked not to post any content directly to CarryMinati, but instead use the Edit Request Wizard. This also applies for any content about Ajey Nagar that you might want to add to other Wikipedia articles. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at CarryMinati, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 13:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at CarryMinati. bonadea contributions talk 14:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a promotion-ony account and for highly likely undisclosed paid editing, per this report.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 10:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]