User talk:Kristenlevenick

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/InstaMed.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 21:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

InstaMed

Hi there. Thanks for following up. I will be happy to help you. Let me review it again, give it some thought and I will get back to you later this evening (it's 1:30 p.m. where I am now). Cheers. Snowysusan 16:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

InstaMed

Good morning! I have looked at the article again and here is the major problem. It is based entirely on information from the company (the news article) and information from the company's website. Without reliable, third party sources, that have discussed the company it is self promotional. Wikipedia requires that articles rely on sufficient independent, reliable sources to establish "notability." It may help if you review Wikipedia's guide on independent sources, guidance on advertising and self promotion and the criteria for notability in relation to companies. If, after you have reviewed these help files, you can revise your article to include more third party sources please feel free to resubmit it for review. In the meantime, if I can be of any more assistance you may contact me at [[User talk:Snowysusan |my talk page. Best Regards, Snowysusan 08:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Draft:InstaMed concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:InstaMed, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:InstaMed

Hello, Kristenlevenick. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "InstaMed".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)