User talk:Kupopo
Six Days from Sunday
[edit]Hi Kupopo, thanks for sticking with the 6dfs article. I took a look at your draft and made a couple of minor formatting fixes to bring it into line with the manual of style. As it stands it clearly does assert notability so should not be speedy deleted again. The one thing you'll need to add is at least one source that allows us to verify the tour information. Did the tour get any press coverage that you can give a URL for? That would really solidify this article.
If you have any questions, feel free to leave a comment on my talk page and I'll try to help. Good luck, Gwernol 13:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
User:Kupopo/Draft of Six Days From Sunday
[edit]I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Kupopo/Draft of Six Days From Sunday, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:Kupopo/Draft of Six Days From Sunday|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Calton | Talk 00:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)