User talk:LIllIi

→ If you came here to tell me that you think I changed, vandalised or deleted something, think again. I solely removed my old user name.

I have reverted the page, which removed the additional "FY." - if you were removing your own name, I see no reason why you needed to add to an archived talk page. However, if I have falsely accused you of vandalism, I apologise. Jammy Simpson | Talk | 00:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot sprotect your user talk page. Also, why did you delete the welcome I gave you? Kukini 00:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can sprotect whatever the heck I want to sprotect. Is it fun to repost something I deleted on my very talk page over and over again? LIllIi 00:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is only allowed to be done by administrators. Kukini 01:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polluted recruited & suited judicial charm

User talk page etiquette[edit]

Regarding user talk pages, it is best to not delete notices on talk pages, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here [1], under "When pages get too long." Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages is often interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil. This can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings. For this reason, if your deletion of notices and concerns on your user talk page is to keep the "clutter" down, I suggest that you instead create archives for these messages. I would be happy to help you do just that if you ask me to. -Kukini 00:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would be really happy to just delete the account and all afiliated data. I am stepping away from this, not trying to get more involved. This probably was the last time I logged in. End LIllIi 00:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And your talk page is not your talk page, but a record that belongs to us all. Kukini 01:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on? What's a priority to you? By what authority do we do/The majority hasn't a clue

Civility[edit]

Your recent comments on Talk:AIDS reappraisal were uncivil and unconstructive. Please review the civility policy as well as the talk page guidelines for more information on appropriate etiquette. MastCell 18:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Barrphoto.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Barrphoto.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Lopez-rebirth.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lopez-rebirth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]