User talk:LUHG
January 2010
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bryan Glazer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Az29 (talk) 04:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
St John's International School Thailand
[edit]Sure I can explain (which I kind of did in the edit summary). First, since all your other edits were vandalism, it doesn't make what you write look very trustworthy. Second, one of wikipedias rules is 'no original research', which means that you need to be able to back up any changes you make. This means that someone else should be able to check the facts (Without having to visit the school). That means what you say should be written down somewhere else, like in a school brochure or something.
- The reason the have this rule is that it forces people to prove things. Just cos someone says something doesn't mean it is true (Which means that someone saying they're at the school doesn't mean that everyone has to believe them)
- Also, there's another rule about conflict of interest - people aren't supposed to write about themselves (Cos they usually dont tell the truth) This means your school principal shouldn't edit the schools page.
- Anyway, the stuff you took out was a statement by someone else that they hadn't proven, so its probably best to leave it out until someone can prove it. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 06:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)