User talk:Lalitd

November 2009[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article HealthWarehouse.com, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 06:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BizRate[edit]

The following discussion was started on User talk:Toddst1 but was moved here to continue.

Hey Todd,

Was just reading through your comments, and you are correct, we are not in the top 3%, and our math is definitely the same.

"Congratulations to our 2009 Platinum Circle of Excellence Winners! Platinum winners received outstanding ratings across all 7 metrics and represent the top 4% of all merchants in the BizRate network."

I'd like you advice on how to best word this. While we are not in the top 4%, we are definitely noted here. Also, any assistance you can provide at making our entry correct would be appreciated.Just let me know what kind of sources you would recommend. Since we are public company, most of the information is in our SEC filings. Thanks again and appreciate your comments. Lalitd (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Lalitd[reply]

I'd just leave it as written.

But since that article was loaded with puffery and advertising-like wording as you wrote it, I'm going to issue a warning to you to stop using Wikipedia for promotion. Continuing to do so will find you blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]