User talk:Latestbhojpuriya

April 2020

Hello, I'm Shanze1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ESPNcricinfo have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Shanze1 (talk) 07:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Scoring (cricket) ‎. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Spike 'em (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Salman Khan, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop spamming unreliable websites. If you continue, you will be blocked and the sites possibly put on the spam black list which WILL stop further promotional edits. Don't spam here. Ravensfire (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And REALLY DO NOT add links to sites where Chrome throws an unsafe warning because of phishing javascript. [1]. That's a REALLY fast way to get blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Now i have read all the wikipedia terms and conditions and now i decided to not to add unused external links. and use it prper way.}}

. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Latestbhojpuriya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now i have read all the wikipedia terms and conditions and now i decided to not to add unused external links. and use it prper way Latestbhojpuriya (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nowhere near sufficient, as per below. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30591 is now closed. Response carried over:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked.  To be unblocked, you must agree to not link to www.bhabuaroad.com  or www.flattickets.com or www.goophe.com or any other linkspam. Unfortunately, spam is not the only problem Please deal with this concern on your talk page- "And REALLY DO NOT add links to sites where Chrome throws an unsafe warning because of phishing javascript." Please describe what constructive edits you would make Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) You already have an open unblock request on your talk, so this request is best dealt with there. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 11:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]