User talk:Latreia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Latreia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  19:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

New Apostolic Reformation[edit]

Hi, I've replied to your posting at Talk:New Apostolic Reformation#Merging article into Global Harvest Ministries, and I'd be glad for any help you can give in improving the article. Thanks, OttoTheFish (talk) 08:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

RfC at Right Sector[edit]

Thanks for commenting at Right Sector: Recent changes. A formal RfC on the question has just started. (“Should we say in the lead say that group members are neofascist?”) --Dervorguilla (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


Latreia for correcting my edit on Right Sector. Not sure where I got that info, given the cite I used. -Darouet (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Those guys' importance is really overrated. Latreia (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
According to polls they have little support, and this would be consistent with published academic literature on far-right politics in Ukraine, which state that extremism is less of a problem there than in neighboring countries. My fear is that, with the threat of war or with people getting killed, populations on all sides become radicalized. -Darouet (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Hillsong Church Kiev for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillsong Church Kiev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillsong Church Kiev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hillsong Church Kiev[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hillsong Church Kiev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 03:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)