User talk:Libiolibiobot

Nomination of Antonella Fiordelisi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonella Fiordelisi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonella Fiordelisi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 10:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonella Fiordelisi

Hello Libiolibiobot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Antonella Fiordelisi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 12:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since it looks like you've tried to create a new account and recreate the article for Giuseppe Prinzi (artist), this has become an indefinite block. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]