User talk:LibrarianPerson
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Lachlan Buchanan, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 04:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Trevor Donovan. Note that IMDB is not a reliable source for most information needed in articles, including date of birth. —C.Fred (talk) 04:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Will it kill you to leave it alone???? It's not his birthday, I don't know where OC registry got it.
- I'm happy with the article being as it was. If you want to change it, you must provide reliable sources to trump OC and demonstrate that the date you're changing to is his birthday. —C.Fred (talk) 00:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Trevor Donovan, you may be blocked from editing. The Orange County Register says Donovan turned 32 in 2010; if you're going to claim a different birth date, you need to provide superior sources to back up the other date—and IMDB is not reliable enough. —C.Fred (talk) 02:28, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Facebook is also not a suitable source for the purpose. This issue has come up in other articles: see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 92#Facebook as a source for birth dates. (Please note that is archived discussion, so you shouldn't add to that thread. If you feel Donovan's situation needs discussed separately, you can start a new thread on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.) —C.Fred (talk) 11:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit]This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Trevor Donovan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LibrarianPerson. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC) |
July 2012
[edit]Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Trevor Donovan. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did to Trevor Donovan, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 08:46, 7 February 2013 (UTC)