User talk:LightingResearchCenter

Light effects on circadian rhythm

I saw your post at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page#Citation question & "self-referencing". I guess from your username that you are from the Lighting Research Center doing the research you referenced in [1]. That gives you a conflict of interest when writing about the research. Clicking the "history" tab at Light effects on circadian rhythm shows the edit was reverted by User:Hordaland who is a frequent contributor to the article and probably knows more than me (almost nothing) about the subject. I will notify Hordaland of your post at User talk:Hordaland. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please create a new account with a username that represents only you. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may ask for a review of this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message. Thank you. - Dank (push to talk) 16:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to be questioned! Editing, especially "policing", sometimes goes too fast. It is easy to misjudge or overlook something.

I have now read the article carefully and reread the removed section Measurement. That section is unencyclopedic; it reads like advertising. This is my opinion, regardless of the user name of the editor who added it. In addition, I have now removed the External links which also seem too commercial.

In this case I feel that I judged correctly.

(Another matter altogether is whether we need this article at all. It could be merged with Circadian rhythm, and its title could point there.) - Hordaland (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]