User talk:LindaBakerBrown

April 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Wellspring camps has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Please refrain from using misleading edit summaries such as this edit. --Oscarthecat (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Oscarthecat (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wellspring Camps

Given the tone of your article, please advise whether you work for 5WPR, who recent gained Welspring Camps as a client very recently. I realise that 5WPR have been caught doing similar edits. --Oscarthecat (talk) 14:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I sure don't. I don't even know who you are referencing. This is my first Wiki article. I'm trying to learn the laws and do this properly. No evil intent here. Thanks for your feedback-- I'm working on it! LindaBakerBrown (talk) 14:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, what did you mean by "Added latest research from Kirschenbaum. Please note: copyright is held by contributor"? - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 14:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]