User talk:Lindenearlejones

March 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of Jamestown colonists, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 14:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pilgrim (sandwich). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 15:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please dont use many capital letters in short descriptions. Please do not write descriptions where somebody put "None". This was done for a reason you do not comprehend yet. I would also advise you not to edit artciless youhave limited knowledge. - Altenmann >talk 16:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of cocktails‎, you may be blocked from editing.

As others have said, {{short description|none}} is usually correct where it appears. See WP:SDNONE. Dan Bloch (talk) 21:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

If you see {Short description|none}, DON't edit it.

P.S. It seems that you were already warnet about this, but you ignored the warning

In general, nearly all your short descriptions are reverted or edited. It looks like you don't know what you are doing. Please stop adding short descriptions. In general, short descriptions must be added by people who know the subject. You are just wasting other editor's time with your wrong edits.

Please stop your disruptive editing. Altenmann >talk 18:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Altenmann >talk 16:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Once again, do not remove {{Short description|none}} without proper reason (as per WP:SDNONE). Not all articles require an explicitly written short description when the title is already descriptive enough, for example this applies to almost all List articles. TollyH (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TollyH You're being uber trivial; no need acknowledging such trivializing.. Lindenearlejones (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TollyH I'm not actively seeking insignificant confrontations to assert authority ; I'll leave that to egotists .. Lindenearlejones (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Altenmann >talk 04:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lindenearlejones: Collaboration is required at Wikipedia. 60% of your 52 edits have been reverted. That requires unnecessary work from other contributors. Rather than persisting and giving trolling replies here, you should be asking questions. A good place for that is WP:Teahouse. You are welcome to put your point of view at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Lindenearlejones. You will be blocked if there are any further problems. Johnuniq (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]