User talk:LittleDoGooder

Welcome!

Hello, LittleDoGooder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Allow me to be the first...--nemonoman (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mister Wonderful

By the way, I suggested Misterwonderful, not MrWonderful. The unabbreviated version is still open for business--nemonoman (talk) 14:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that now. I can't believe I changed it my head like that between reading and typing. I almost did ThreeQuartersOfTheWorld. Sort of ominous. LittleDoGooder (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments at Talk:God in a Pill?. I have commented there specifically and generally. I don't want to participate in the discussion at NPOV Noticeboard as there is no particular article listed to discuss, which seems to indicate a suggestion to get an Wikipedia administrator to do a mass deletion of Meher Babba related articles -- something I think is probably not very consistent with Wikipedia policy which is more constructive and directed more to improvement than mass-obliteration of whole subjects -- especially based on one person's inner guidance. So I am going to stick to discussing one article at a time on their discussion pages. I don't even know how to address the suggestion that a whole pallet of articles be deleted. How would you even discuss that? I think the mass-tagging approaches vandalism and is not in good faith, as still there has been no attempt up to now to address the articles on their discussion page or seek consensus of any kind. I think it is an abuse of tags. But I don't think it's within my power to revert them again. I hope others will check all this out. See discussion here. LittleDoGooder (talk) 12:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{help}} A user named User talk:Editwondergirl is putting notability tags on virtually any article having to do with Meher Baba and has worked on nothing else. In spite of efforts the put them back. These include a religious holiday observed by Meher Baba people as well as the flag of his people for examples. (Silence Day, Meher Baba's flag) There are categories for both articles (rainbowflags, and religious holidays) and yet no article related to any other religion or group is tagged in like manner. What do we do? We have tried talking and he or she just puts back the notability tags on 11 articles. I'd appreciate some direction on process. LittleDoGooder (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can try adding sources to the articles if you haven't already. Looking at the articles, they don't seem very well sourced and unlikely to expand. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ten Pound Hammer. LittleDoGooder (talk) 17:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Page 173 from 1926 notebook.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Page 173 from 1926 notebook.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Sources tags on 3 of 5 PMs

I have removed the primary sources tags on the PMs you alerted me about. That's 4 out of 5 PMs being tagged by Jossi for inadequate Primary Sourcing. He is a man with an agenda. See discussions on Prem Rawat, also discussions about protecting Sarah Palin. He's a maverick and he's getting all mavericky. --nemonoman (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More: I sympathize with Editwondergirl and Jossi about many of the MB related articles that they have tagged. There's a nice Indian proverb, loosely translated: The crow's baby is a big deal to the crow. To a very small community, those articles are notable, NPOV and reasonably sourced. Outside that community, it's hard to say what impression they give. --nemonoman (talk) 14:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More More: see here.

Oh my gosh! I just read that whole article you sent me. How depressing. LittleDoGooder (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see it is even on Wikipedia. Criticism_of_Wikipedia#Conflicts_involving_policy_makers. LittleDoGooder (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Hindu language" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hindu language has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 1 § Hindu language until a consensus is reached. Isla (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]