User talk:Littledoggymack

Nomination of Shabazz Sundiata Sallier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabazz Sundiata Sallier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabazz Sundiata Sallier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 23:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Littledoggymack, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 09:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabazz Sundiata Sallier. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't let the police investigate Wikipedia for hate crime on a student with a disability yes I wrote an article about a student with a disability and you can be charged in the court of law so far the police King County said you guys have already violated 2 WAC Codes in the State of WA they are trying to see what laws you broke where Wikipedia is located. Please be nice before I read you your rights and hold you accountable even more than what you are. ! It is a federal offense to hate crime someone specially if they have a disability or disabled. O please stop cyber bullying as well " However, Prosecutors have used existing laws on the books to prosecute individuals suspected of cyberbullying. Criminal harassment statutes can often provide a basis for bringing charges in severe cases, and more serious criminal charges have been brought in cases where the offense has resulted in suicide or other tragic consequences.

Recently created cyber harassment statutes may also provide an avenue for charging online bullies in some states. Nearly half of U.S. states include "cyberbullying" in their broader bullying laws, while most states also include either "cyberbullying" or "electronic harassment" as well. The nationwide trend is toward greater accountability for bullying in general, including criminal statutes.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Littledoggymack (talk • contribs) 08:45, 19 November 2016(UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the formal warning above, let me add that I am glad to see that you are opposed to cyberbullying, since that hopefully means that you will retract your own harrassment of a fellow Wikipedian as well as the legal threat (which must be retracted per Wikipedia policy). Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 08:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No legal threats

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Wikipedia is not a branch of the government, it is a private entity. You do not have any more of a right to free speech on Wikipedia than random strangers do in your house. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]