User talk:Liz walters7

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not make any further changes to contentious articles or WP:BLP articles without sourcing your changes. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Liz walters7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Will Beback talk 21:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kuru (talk) 21:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported your fourth revert to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. I would strongly urge you to self-revert to avoid blocking. Kuru (talk) 22:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Mass Deportation section of Illegal Immigration to the United States

Thanks for your note. There's no question that there are multiple interpretations of the U.S. Constitution. Some interpretations are endorsed by the Supreme Court, and must be regarded as the prevailing interpretation. Other views may be significant, and if so should be included in the article on the relevant section, clause, or amendment. But inserting non-standard interpretations into other articles is a distraction. For example, some people believe the 2nd Amendment only applies to militias. that's relevant to add to Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but we wouldn't want to include that in every article on gun control or gun licensing. Anyway, if there's more to discuss let's use the article talk page instead os user talk pages. Will Beback talk 23:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]