User talk:Lk95/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Album chart templates
Just letting you know, if you're copypasting or just simply whenever you add album chart templates to pages, you're adding invisible spacing onto the end. I don't know if the place you're copying from has that spacing or what device you're using is doing it, but if you click (or tap) past the end of the template, there's invisible spacing that shouldn't be there. Ss112 14:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for telling me, it's probably from the page I copied it from. I try to avoid it in the future. -- Lk95 15:25, 10 March 2017 (CET)
Billboard 200
So what is this, you updating all the pages on the English Wikipedia as some sort of payback because I do it on the German Wikipedia because you see I didn't update the pages in time? Seriously, man. The page barely updated half an hour ago and you're already over here having done them all. Are you just trying to rack up your edit count by whatever means necessary? I'm afraid it really seems like it. Ss112 20:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Can you for once not target me for things I do on here? It's annoying and sometimes I'm scared to edit anything just because it makes your name pop up on my talk page again. If I really cared about my post count I would do many more things on here. Also, if your edits on the German wikipedia bothered me I would've expressed that a long time ago. Just because I update 2 or 3 Billboard positions once in a blue moon doesn't mean I'm angry. Can't you just accept it? It's really not as deep as you think it is. You know my behaviour by now and that I only do this when I see some chart positions having been up for a while (it updated an hour ago before I saw it btw). -- Lk95 23:03, 26 March 2017 (CEST)
- I never said you couldn't edit anything, so if you actually are "scared" to edit anything lest you think you will receive a message from me, that's completely unnecessary and I'm sorry that you feel that way based on my previous messages to you, but I just wonder about your motives sometimes. Ss112 21:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Citing the correct article
Per your edit on Witness (Katy Perry album), please cite the correct URL. This article you linked to says nothing about Katy Perry. It's clear you got the peak from Offizielle Deutsche Charts' Facebook page, so I linked to that for you. Ss112 14:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! For a minute I thought the article said the same as the Facebook post. -- Lk95 16:35, 16 June 2017 (CEST)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Lk95. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Year-end charts
Look, I'm sick and tired of playing this back-and-forth game with you. You must think because year-end charts aren't weekly updates that they're yours to compete to do with somebody. You don't do the weekly Swiss chart updates on the English Wikipedia because they're covered, so why are the final Swiss charts of the year any different? Are they "yours" to do because you noticed it updating two minutes before I did? I know the German Wikipedia has far less things to do on it than the English Wikipedia, but I don't actually think you want to "compete" for things to do with other users. Weekly charts, year-end charts would generally be covered by the same editor. Ss112 14:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- WP:Communication is required. Ss112 14:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- And I'm tired of discovering something that could be updated on Wikipedia but holding back because someone else feels solely entitled to do it. You didn't even say anything when I did the Austrian year-end charts even though you do them every week so I thought I do the Swiss ones upon discovering them. You don't need to revert my correct edits, I'm literally responding to you right now. I think it's best to quote you in your own words right now: "If someone has started updating a country's charts before you, I think it's quite rude to come in and start beating them to the punch by taking it over, espeically when you clearly know (as I bet you looked at the previous peaks you missed) that I started updating the UK's peaks this week. Now you're rushing to do it before me. I find it quite disruptive and rude, and obviously you have no care that you are coming off as rude." That's what you're doing to me but for some reason suddenly think it's okay. I admit when I did something wrong but I fail to see my mistake today. You just wanted to do them to claim them as yours and got angry as soon as you saw I did them? -- Lk95 15:31, 31 December 2017 (CET)
- Yes, and you've done that already by jumping to do the Austrian and Swiss year-end charts because you think they're different. Weekly and year-end charts are part of the same thing: They're published by the same companies for the same countries. Year-end charts are really no different. Why just because they're year-end are they suddenly "yours" to do? You feel entitled to do plenty of things on the German Wikipedia (and here, like certifications) that I don't question, but when I bring things up to you you think it's a problem that I "claim" things—perhaps, because we don't need two people "competing" to do the same thing. Year-end charts are always published close to when the weekly charts for those countries come out, so anybody who pays attention to charts would notice them like I did. Also, responding to me doesn't mean keep going on with that now I've just pointed it out. Ss112 14:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- I know they are part of the same thing but what is so bad about the fact that I discovered them and subsequently put the information on Wikipedia when I saw they haven't been updated yet + knowing they could've been there for a while without anyone else noticing they were being published? No, I actually don't feel entitled to do all these things. If someone else did it before me, then so be it. I rarely revert people unless it's wrong or they added lackluster information. -- Lk95 15:56, 31 December 2017 (CET)
- Because I thought it was an unspoken thing that they're covered even if not done instantly. The revert(s) were only to get you to notice. I didn't know what device you were using—I read all the time that mobile users don't get notifications from talk page messages and often can't notice them if they're using the app and all that. Ss112 15:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- I know they are part of the same thing but what is so bad about the fact that I discovered them and subsequently put the information on Wikipedia when I saw they haven't been updated yet + knowing they could've been there for a while without anyone else noticing they were being published? No, I actually don't feel entitled to do all these things. If someone else did it before me, then so be it. I rarely revert people unless it's wrong or they added lackluster information. -- Lk95 15:56, 31 December 2017 (CET)
- Yes, and you've done that already by jumping to do the Austrian and Swiss year-end charts because you think they're different. Weekly and year-end charts are part of the same thing: They're published by the same companies for the same countries. Year-end charts are really no different. Why just because they're year-end are they suddenly "yours" to do? You feel entitled to do plenty of things on the German Wikipedia (and here, like certifications) that I don't question, but when I bring things up to you you think it's a problem that I "claim" things—perhaps, because we don't need two people "competing" to do the same thing. Year-end charts are always published close to when the weekly charts for those countries come out, so anybody who pays attention to charts would notice them like I did. Also, responding to me doesn't mean keep going on with that now I've just pointed it out. Ss112 14:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- And I'm tired of discovering something that could be updated on Wikipedia but holding back because someone else feels solely entitled to do it. You didn't even say anything when I did the Austrian year-end charts even though you do them every week so I thought I do the Swiss ones upon discovering them. You don't need to revert my correct edits, I'm literally responding to you right now. I think it's best to quote you in your own words right now: "If someone has started updating a country's charts before you, I think it's quite rude to come in and start beating them to the punch by taking it over, espeically when you clearly know (as I bet you looked at the previous peaks you missed) that I started updating the UK's peaks this week. Now you're rushing to do it before me. I find it quite disruptive and rude, and obviously you have no care that you are coming off as rude." That's what you're doing to me but for some reason suddenly think it's okay. I admit when I did something wrong but I fail to see my mistake today. You just wanted to do them to claim them as yours and got angry as soon as you saw I did them? -- Lk95 15:31, 31 December 2017 (CET)