User talk:Logicalfoundationisdoubt

Nomination of DJ White Shadow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ White Shadow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ White Shadow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:The Fame Monster, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Britney Spears, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 21:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have already stated my reason on the discussion page for Britney Spears.--Logicalfoundationisdoubt (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qrsdogg (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Well I have already posted my reason on the discussion for the page. But they keep ignoring it. What am I suppsoed to do? Everyone on here does as they please. The source they are using as a referendce in invalid. It is a biased website. How do I report that? --Logicalfoundationisdoubt (talk) 21:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS/N is usually a good place to raise the issue if you think a page is making a claim based on an unreliable source. Qrsdogg (talk) 01:38, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]