User talk:Logiharmonyone

Hello Logiharmonyone,

It looks like you created your "Logiharmonyone" Wikipedia account just to edit the Harmony, Florida page. Congratulations!

Since your primary purpose (so far) on Wikipedia seems to be helping to maintain the Harmony, Florida page, I was hoping that you could explain your edits to that page.

If you look at the history of the Harmony, Florida page, you will see that on "00:32, 29 April 2010" someone using the false identity "GarnetKeeler" made edits similar to yours. Likewise, since the "GarnetKeeler" identity was proven to be a false one, the edits were therefore made anonymously, also similar to yours.

On "11:54, 1 June 2010" a Wikipedia moderator expunged the changes similar to your recent changes with the following commentary:

   changed visibility of a revision on page Harmony, 
   Florida: content hidden and edit summary hidden (RD2: 
   Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material: No 
   evidence that the cited website is all the work of one 
   person - personal attack)

Why did you change this page? You replaced factual information with information not supported by the facts. An explanation is warranted.

Please also provide concrete evidence in support of your changes to the historical information which has appeared on the Harmony, Florida Wikipedia page since 2008. GeorgeSchiro (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GeorgeSchiro. My edits are completely verifiable simply by viewing the majority of writings at the Harmony Florida Commons web site. The sections that were edited previously reflected the opinions of just one individual, yet they were presented as being the factual interpretations of many Harmony residents. This is not a verifiable reporting of facts by any stretch of the imagination. It would appear that the person using the handle "Geo" on the Harmony Commons web site, who I assume to be you, has a direct conflict of interest if he is the person posting information on this Wikipedia page. His views are neither neutral (as required by Wikipedia) nor are they objective.

The latest edits to this page are factual representations as evidenced in the Harmony Florida Commons web site that is already cited as a reference.

Logiharmonyone (talk) 01:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the late reply. I have been out-of-town.

You are quite mistaken "Logiharmonyone". The changes you made are not factual. What you revised was not based on what appears in the referenced newsgroup, although the newsgroup clearly shows posts by several others who do not support your position. Rather, what was edited by you is based on a written document signed by 5 other Harmony residents years ago, not including myself or my family members. Thus what you have written is patently false and it can be proven to be so without the need for nebulous statements like "evidenced in the Harmony Florida Commons web site".

Thus your non-specified "evidence" is similar to your anonymous edits, not credible, IMHO. If you truly believe in what you are writing, then why hide behind anonymity when you write it Richard, I mean "Logiharmonyone"? George Schiro is indeed my real name. "Geo" is well known as my nickname. What is your name?

Anyway, I will produce my documentation if needed by Wikipedia moderators.

I would recommend that you revert your unsubstantiated changes before a moderator does so for you. GeorgeSchiro (talk) 22:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Logiharmonyone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The text above is from a canned "welcome" message, but I do welcome you. As you noticed I am aware of your editing due to the Harmony, Florida article, and i also just welcomed the other newish editor there. Sorry you didn't get a proper welcome from someone, sooner. :)

Like I just said also to the other editor at Harmony, Florida, I think you could be a great contributor to Wikipedia. I appreciate your attention to sources and to detail in fixing up the short article.

I happen to like editing about historic sites, like places listed on the National Register of Historic Places, because there shouldn't be any controversy about them, is what I originally figured. And it is sort of fun to visit places and take pics and upload them, and help in the big List of RHPs of the U.S. It turns out that there can be controversy about historic sites though, I eventually discovered, although less than if you chose to edit about Palestine or abortion or the Liancourt Rocks or other hotspots. Anyhow, welcome to wikipedia! cheers --do ncr am 18:55, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, Logiharmonyone. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Harmony, Florida, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]