User talk:LongLiveMusic/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:LongLiveMusic. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Garage rock task force
Would you be interested in joining this project when it is established? I noticed you are a very important content creator, and one of the goals of this project is to create new articles for garage rock related subjects, which will be recommended on the page. Please get back to me when you can, we could use your help. Thank you!TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello again, the task force is up and running here. Please add yourself and feel free to add the userbox available there. I started a to-do list on the page that features some song and album articles you could create if that interests you. More to come from the list.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
Hi LongLiveMusic, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, LongLiveMusic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
RE: your edit and message
Hi LongliveMusic,
This is in reference to your undoing of the edit I had made on the Diganth page. You'd mentioned that I could include a citation and re-add the edit, in your first message. I have accordingly added 3 citations which I mentioned in the references section; one of the citations is the online version of the Newspaper Deccan Herald; another is the online page of the media network News18. May I know why these are not considered reliable sources?
The "reliable sources" section you referred me to, contains the following description: ""News reporting" from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact....". "The term "published" is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online...." and "The word "source" when citing sources on Wikipedia has three related meanings: ...The piece of work itself (the article, book) .........."
I am puzzled as to why actual published online articles by Deccan Herald and News18 should not fit the above guidelines? Would be grateful if you could let me know what I am missing here.
NoleDjoker (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I post something about tourism in Wikipedia and they remove it when I write something I add only more information like any user do in Wikipedia. Thank you. Mustafa.ccc (talk) 09:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Edit on Diganth page
Hi LongLiveMusic,
As suggested by you, I have added the citations both as inline text and in the references section. I trust the edits should be OK now, these are from published online news sources (News18 and Deccan Herald), and I can only assure you that I am only trying to edit with relevant info/details. Thanks.
NoleDjoker (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- @NoleDjoker: I've removed much of the changes because they just seem to want to encourage readers to drool over the subject, which I've also noticed in some of your other edits. We don't feature fan/media nicknames in the infobox. "thecheckernews.com" is a poor reference, and neithef of the two others (News18 and Deccan Herald) fawn over the subject's "youthful, clean cut good looks". The content reads as promotional drivel, and most of it has been cut. I don't understand why we care at all that fans call him by one of his character names. If I saw Arnold Schwarzenegger on the street and called him "Terminator", that doesn't make him more special, it just implies that I'm an idiot for not knowing his name. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 23:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Infobox song is used for singles
The consensus during this March-May 2017 request for comments was to merge Infobox single to Template:Infobox song. The code and explanation of the parameters is included in the template documentation.
When writing new song articles or updating existing infoboxes, it is a good idea to check the current template page for changes (this also applies to subtemplates, such as {{Extra chronology}}, {{Extra track listing}}, {{Extra album cover}}, and {{Audio sample}}). I've updated five of your recent edits and there are probably several more. Using the new templates will make the transition easier and be simpler for others to update and correct. Let me know if you have any questions.
—Ojorojo (talk) 16:15, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, LongLiveMusic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Flamingo Kid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Midnighters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Cameo Records.
Please see my comments on the talk page. I have reverted your edits. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For your creation of terrific articles for timeless songs. Well done! Tdl1060 (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, LongLiveMusic. Not sure how I never received this message (below) until today... I'm on here all the time. Anyways. In response to the message sent, I feel a mistake has been made by removing the update. All you have to do is WATCH the movie Nightbreed and you will see that the song Johnny Get Angry is covered by a character in the film, it's also in the credits of the film. I guess I will get around to doing a "proper citation" for the film one day, but honestly, I have better things to do with my time. I just thought it would be cool to add that info to the wiki page for the song. Oh well. Thanks for letting me know why it was removed. I was actually curious.
Hello, I'm LongLiveMusic. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Johnny Get Angry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
70.185.100.107 (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)