User talk:Longuniongirl

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Longuniongirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked infintely?

Decline reason:

Not a request for unblocking. You'll want to look at our Guide to Appealing Blocks for more information. See also my comments below. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 19:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin - this brand new user had been restoring the edits of recently blocked editors - see the history of Blackout Ripper (restoring edits of User:Albsol88t, themselves a block-evading sock of User:I cant think of a name 994). Also see Jon the Postman - restoring edits made by two IP addresses (but which are the same user) that had been blocked for violating 3RR. Some edits are OK, but these two seem to indicate a block evasion issue. Black Kite 19:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not evading block-evading. DO U FIRE INDISCEMANTELY AND HOPE YOU GOT YOUR ENEMIES?

{{helpme}} how can I report you to wikipedia trustees?

Hi. First, calm down. If you are not evading a block placed on another user account, then could you explain some of the edits that Black Kite notes, above? I don't yet see Checkuser data here that would prove your relationship to the other blocked accounts, but I have to agree it looks odd when several accounts are blocked, and then their edits are re-done by a new account. Take a deep breath and discuss the issue. Flipping out about the situation isn't going to help anyone, and will do little to prove your innocence. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 19:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfy my curiosity please

I would love to know why you made this edit [1] ... and welcome to wikipedia. Abtract (talk) 22:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]