User talk:LordVoldemort728/Archive 14

This is an archive of past discussions about User:LordVoldemort728. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

→

Declination of Draft:Tulaji Angre

Hello, wikpedian. In the reasons for my draft article being declined, you mentioned that "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." However, I cited a lot of sources, many of which were authored by reliable authors and websites. Kindly be specific about the "unreliable" sources. I have cited references in the "legacy" section now or if you find the citations unnecessary, you can entirely remove the section and approve creation of the draft. Pls I dank memer (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I hadn't wrote the paragraph "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources." I only wrote that Citations are improperly sourced and the AFC reviewer script wrote that "submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 14:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

In that case kindly create the article Pls I dank memer (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

AfC Declines

As raised at WT:AFC could you be more specific with your declines if that's possible? E.g., at Draft:Khidmat Guzar, you declined because of WP:N and WP:V being failed, further writing that plot section is unsourced. However, per MOS:FILMPLOT and MOS:FICTIONPLOT routine uncontroversial plot summaries are acceptable, verifiability is required (as in inline citations) for quotations, material that has been challenged, material that might likely be challenged, or contentious-BLP related content, a plot summary does not fall under this (I agree with the decline otherwise- the sources does not demonstrate notability but it would help if your comments could outline the main problem).

Draft:Thomas Vadakkemulanjanal also clearly did not have unsourced sections, all of the sections have at least one inline citation, there are more citations in the form of external links. External links in text per MOS:EXTERNALLINKS is unacceptable, the article also has far too many non-independent non-SIGCOV refs, raising concerns with notability and refbomb, but your statement appears to be not the case. Therefore, could you please (if you have the time) revise your decline comments or discuss here in more detail? Thank you! VickKiang (talk) 20:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LordVoldemort728. Thank you for your work on Suryabanshi Suraj. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

You can link this from the constituency and the relevant election pages.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. C. Samantsinhar has been accepted

N. C. Samantsinhar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheeshram Singh Ravi has been accepted

Sheeshram Singh Ravi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.