User talk:Lost Knob

Your AIV entry

Your entry at WP:AIV was inappropriate and has been removed. Tagging a suspected sockpuppet with a {{sockpuppet}} tag is not vandalism. There is policy supporting the process, here. The removal of the speedy deletion tag was warranted, as the article did not meet speedy deletion criteria. If you have disagreements with CFIF, please discuss them on the appropriate talk pages. Do not disrupt Wikipedia to try to make a point. Thank you. Kafziel 19:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The_Sweeney_Series_One.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_Sweeney_Series_One.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clit shield

The article Clit shield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by banned editor, copy of article from a different wiki, 15 years of no sources whatsoever.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Kusma (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]