Jump to content

User talk:LucyAlice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, LucyAlice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin008 (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Women & Politics Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Women & Politics Institute and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 16:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jennifer L. Lawless, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.womensnetworkri.com/jlawless.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Who is in charge of removing the tag of "may not meet the general notability guideline" or the "copy edit needed" tag? Am I able to remove these or must it be done by a wiki admin/editor? LucyAlice (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • First things first, you are an editor - all of us are. Be bold.
  • Secondly, I removed the notability tag, as you have a reference listing this is the only one of its kind in the US. That is notable. Keep working on the article, as you need to copy edit it quite a bit and get it to Wikipedia format. Perhaps we'll move this at a later date to Articles for Creation while you work on it, and then move it back when it's ready? -- Crazysane (T/C\D) 17:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) You can, if the problems have been addressed. Any editor may re-add it, though.  ono  17:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jennifer L. Lawless, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.womensnetworkri.com/jlawless.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jennifer L. Lawless saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While not a word-for-word copy, the article is a close paraphrase and needs to be rewritten further (preferably from scratch) in order to avoid infringing copyright. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the article and believe it no longer infringes on copyright. LucyAlice (talk) 18:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How long will it take an admin to verify that the article is now acceptable or not? LucyAlice (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. This is a bio of a professor that she wrote herself and gave to me and to any other places/organizations/websites that request her bio. I did my best to rewrite it in way that conformed to Wiki standards and did not violate copyright. However, it is a person's bio and therefor is going to basically say the same thing no matter where it's published. How can this be resolved? LucyAlice (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your first problem is that people should not work on the articles about them. To high risk of bias. The article should be written about them by third parties - using verifiable information. I'll leave the {{helpme}} template open while I look at the article for issues.
  • How the heck did I get logged out? -- Crazysane (T/C\D) 15:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]