User talk:MLCommons

Welcome!

Hello, MLCommons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
-- Python (Talk to me!) 21:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Daniel Levinson

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Daniel Levinson, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Daniel Levinson seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Daniel Levinson, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 22:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have made very clear that is was one of the three founders of the field of positive adult development. He is also one of the most cited.

Let me know if you need more. Please do not delete.

MLCommons 22:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)MLcommons MLCommons 22:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)MLCommons[reply]

your edits

MLC Thanks for the suggestions. I will revise as soon as I get a minute.

I am somewhat concerned by the quality and nature of your edits. For John Anthony Nevin, you provided a long list of journal articles, listed alphabetically by first author, which is not appropriate for a general encyclopedia, which is not a bibliography, and a collection of awards and memberships; for Daniel Levinson, you provide almost no exact information at all. Neither of them is right. For Positive Adult Development you provide no source at all to show that the use of the term is standard, or even give a definition, and refer generally to people's work without giving references, and list as related topics what seems like almost everything possible in psychology.

MLC September 30. Added sources. Gave definitions

I strongly support the inclusion of articles on significant academics like these two and significant academic specialties. But i urge you to write more informative articles. If you'd like some suggestions, see Wikipedia:What is a good article? and Wikipedia:Guide to layout DGG (talk) 05:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to call your attention to WP:COI. (I'm thinking about your insertion of refs to your own articles) DGG (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see the improvements. Good work so far, but there's some more to go.

for Levinson, at the very least add material about his birthdate and place, his degrees and positions, and add reviews of his books. Any librarian can help you find them. Try to find some biographical notice about him--there should be one.

MLC: Done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.160.201 (talk) 22:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

for Nevin, try to organize it a little more readably. Try to find references for the awards. Try to find out what are the most significant of the papers, and consider listing only them, not the minor one or the book chapters. . List them in chronological order, not alphabetic. Try to find some biographical notice about him--there should be one. DGG (talk) 02:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MLC: Done

Proposed deletion of Society for research in adult development

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Society for research in adult development, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jac16888 (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]