User talk:MXZeroSectasMX

they are not erroneous and are not opinions, since they are facts based on evidence, clearly the one who erases this information is just an ignorant who does not know what is a controversy and what is an opinion

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, MXZeroSectasMX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mr. Credible (talk) 00:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to La Luz del Mundo appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 17:54, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article La Luz del Mundo has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to La Luz del Mundo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at La Luz del Mundo. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at La Luz del Mundo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing, including edit warring and persistently attempting to use Wikipedia to publicise a particular point of view. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The length of your block has been extended for block evasion. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]