User talk:Madison-chan
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Madison-chan. |
Welcome!
Hello, Madison-chan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
{{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a lot man :) --Madison-chan (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC) Madison-chan
Would you like to tell us why you have decided to create a new account and go on a huge "deletion spree" all of a sudden? –MuZemike 04:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I haven't been just deleting articles. As a side note, could you adopt me? --Madison-chan (talk) 14:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
::true, you've said keep a few times. But how do you explaining coming here 2 days ago and immediately having some rough idea of AfD-talk, and knowing -- pr better, pretending to know--about our blocking policy [1]. Your very 1st edit after making a user page was to nominate an article for AfD--an exceptionally bad nomination that got speedy kept, but you did carry out the steps correctly. And almost right after you commented at an Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peephole bra that this [2] image of a fully dressed woman in a winter coat from Commons was erotic.
And you've been commenting there on all subjects; most people start at AfD in one field that they know most about, and branch out as they get experience, People sometimes seem surprisingly knowledgeable at first when they learn about Wikipedia in advance, in order to write here, but this is a little different. It took most of us weeks or months to just learn the language, even well enough to say foolish things in it. If I thought you were a new editor, I'd consider offering to adopt you. In face of the weirdest contribution record I have ever seen here, I mainly wonder who you are or were on Wikipedia. Perhaps I'm wrong, so I invite you to show us that by doing some actual editing. I'm always ready to apologize. DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Allrighty, since no one here seems to appreciate my efforts, I'll just leave. Bye bye, Wikipedia. Guess I'll create a couple sockpuppets and vandalize some articles. It’s the least I can do for the Wikipedia editors that were soooo nice to me. --Madison-chan (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I invite you back to the discussion, as subsequent evidence has come forward: sources available which show that this film HAS screened, will continue screening, and is recieving coverage. Even the nominator has come forward to grant it has screened, and so I believe WP:NF is now p[roperly shown as being met. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DGG ( talk ) 16:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)