User talk:Madkracker6969

Law of Reflection

I stumbled across the Law of Attraction when I watched a DVD called, THE SECRET. It talks about how to use your human mind to your benefit and to achieve more than you have in the past. It was very striking to me. Later on, however, I stumbled upon an old way called the law of return also called 3x3. The law states that whatever you take or receive will be either given or taken times three. Basically meaning that any action or inaction will result in a three-fold return on investment (ROI) also used in the financial market as wholesale price and retail price where wholesale averages about 33.3% of retail which puts retail at 99.9% a three-fold return after giving. When this action is not performed by the individual a decrease is experienced, but is hard to explain or even tell how or why it is happening, just that it is. I did mix something in with that that should also stand out on its own. That of "Give & Take" also known as Karma, also described to some as respect. This means that whatever you take, you should give back in return. Take is another form of reception of course. So Give & Take combined with 3x3 gives you a methodology of action and inaction and law of attraction gives you advantage and disadvantage. Here comes the scary part; put those three things together with The Art of War by Sun Tzu and you now have a method of approach to any given situation, a means to turn whatever the outcome is to your advantage and a means to reciprocate in order to fulfill your desires. But now you see that there is a phrase in the title which states reflection...what is that, you ask? A simple analogy would be that of light and reflection off of tangible objects in order to perceive what color they really are after they absorb all the other colors save the one that wasn't which we call it's color. Well, experience works the same way with action and reaction. Whatever you put forth you get back times three whether you see it or not, whether you're looking or not. But it's nice to know that it's going on around us and that it's always a potential tool in our toolbox whenever we need it. As are all the other things. So, how does one go about using such a device. Well, here is a fine example of how to use the law of return: Let's say you would like to begin a project, but you don't even know where to start. Well, in order to do that you may want to employ my technique of question answering and then move on from there until you find a product or service that you would like to provide the public or private individuals for a price. If you don't want to sell a product, but you want to make money; give it away, but make shipping and handling cover your 3x3 ROI and shipping. The result will be that of a constant ROI of customer satisfaction. So, back to the drawing board; you need to find a way to market your product or service, but you don't know how to do it. Make a collage of events or situations that are conducive to your agenda and post them on your walls. What this does is gives your life a means to visualize your objectives in order to find out what you need to do. Once this is done, you have to put in the effort to achieve and whatever that effort is will be reflected back to you as a 3x3 ROI. If you get a favorable ROI you performed the correct task, if you did not, you simply realize that what you did resulted in that type of ROI, but some people don't document it so they forget and return to it again later to be dismayed by the perpetually same ROI and are continually disappointed which then causes, from the disappointment, the investment to be poor and so a poor ROI is then incurred. This doesn't just work with a project of money, it works with people, animals, kids, adults, family, vehicles, trains, weather, space, oceans, etc. And what do we know works in such mysterious ways within everything...I'll leave the answer to you.

AQ (Answer Questioning) Methodology

AQ Introduces a working cycle to the QA methods. This method may be used in conjunction with any of the known or newly founded methods. QA method may be used upon perception of a posed or answer. The means by which it is utilized can be manipulated beyond it's primary usage; however, the primary usage is taking an answer and questioning it; turning that very answer into a question. Example; A"I like sushi." Q"(Why do) I like sushi(?)" A"The flavor." Q"(What about) the flavor of sushi (do) I like?" Inadvertantly, this may unveil different methods of thinking and perception as well. While most would agree that this seems to be the endall stratagem, it is only a starting point with endless possibilities. Any number of question methods may be used to derive the number of WHY as in, A = ∞(Q), the answer may yield any number of questions to be asked; thereby unveiling an ongoing process constantly being reborn into the research being performed. The QA methodology utilizes just the opposite where, 1(Q) = ((∞(A)-∞) = 1(A), supposedly there is only one true answer in reality everything else is perception or plausibility. Utilized alongside other forms of communication; debate may be greatly improved. Even this methodology should be questioned.

NOAVAECES Project

NOAVAECES is pronounced like nov·i·ces. The idea behind this project is an all-encompassing ability to manage EVERYTHING within life.

NOAVAECES is an acronym meaning:
N = Nexus
O = Omnibus
A = Accelerando
V = Vectorial
A = Anamnesis
E = Espial
C = Circadian
E = Ethos
S = Supernova

The ideas behind this stemmed from another idea that everything is connected and everything matters; to that, everything should be managed. This would be the management system that would handle everything. And because the person utilizing this system would be the ones putting in the information, any resulting effects from utilizing the system would be their consequential responsibility, whether success or failure. Also, they would have viable proof of their existences that could be recounted even after death. Any secrets can easily be maintained through encryption or coding methodology.

Hypothesis: Paradox of Singularity

Hypothesis: Paradox of Singularity==

Started: 03/27/2008 @ 12:25 PM PST

Paradox: Everything can be reduced to a commonality factor being the singularity of peculiarity and individualality.

Axioms:

1) Every human has amassed within them similarities, which by definition can be reduced down to the atom.

2) Common denominators within the human condition within the mind of people are that we are not alone when in fact we are alone within our bodies (interactive sensory perception carbon-based life forms).

3) All of human nature teaches us that when we reduce things to their common denominators that we begin to see similarities and patterns.

Summary of Hypothetical Experimentation: Discovery of forms of experimentation to challenge the axioms of society, not in society, but the society within my mind. To clear out obscurity where obscurity clearly exists. And even the practice to remain and grow more aware of this current state of being will be one of these tools that I will use. I will challenge first my own common knowledge first within myself, and then to understand by comparative the world around me and the purposes for obscuring the simple truth of existence.

Tools to be employed: 1) As stated above - Answer Questioning: to question things not established by the scientific method of assumption, question of the actual unknown, challenge of the assumption, and finally experimentation through similar process to the revelation of new information and awareness of environmental surroundings and self.

2) Divide and Conquer - A tactic stated clearly within the book written by Sun Tzu called "The Art of War"

3) Chaos Theory - This is tricky to explain, in order to be focused upon one item at a time, a distraction must be set upon all distractive thoughts perceived and potential percievable diversions. To truly be focused one must understand the nature of the Sensory Isolation Chamber.

4) Common Denominators - Here is another tricky subject; how can someone claim a similarity when there are differences within an outcome which is present at the moment of observation? In order to understand the similarities one must first understand differences.

5) Capricious nature of human beings - To understand the present, study the past. This in itself becomes tricky on account of propaganda and scapegoating set upon individuals who were already exiled. (Similar to scapegoating the scapegoat, passing the buck, blame) When the argument might be reasonably about our singular resource that is within our vested interest that we -those who profit from foreign oil- protect.

6) I am alone in this experiment and no one is going to help me to experiment and understand myself.

7) Unite smaller units to become an overwhelming force against a singular division of a whole.

Another interesting possibility lies within the very nature of existence; potential unification by being overwhelmed by the majority, "democracy"! In order to overwhelm a potentially destructive and/or obstructive influence, overwhelm the influence with a united influence of potential creation and/or evolutionary adaptation which will turn the disadvantage into an advantage and actually promote growth rather then hinder. Every colony ever constructed basically.

And some other ideals to help coast this experiment along: Dan Millman: Life has just three rules? Socrates: And you already know them... Dan Millman: Paradox, humour, and change. Socrates: Paradox... Dan Millman: Life is a mystery. Don't waste time trying to figure it out. Socrates: Humour... Dan Millman: Keep a sense of humour, especially about yourself. It is a strength beyond all measure. Socrates: Change... Dan Millman: Know that nothing stays the same. --The Peaceful Warrior; DVD

On to the experiment