User talk:Madnanbashir1

Speedy deletion nomination of CellularFactory

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on CellularFactory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at CellularFactory

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with CellularFactory. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at CellularFactory, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV

Hi Madnanbashir1, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at CellularFactory to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly undoing the speedy deletion tagging of an article, then recreating it minutes after it was properly deleted. Madnanbashir1, you need to slow down and take a little time to learn about our policies. Just because a company exists does not mean that it can have a Wikipedia article. Rather, there needs to be some evidence that the comapny is notable (usually this means its been discussed in multiple, independent, reliable sources). The article you created doesn't even establish the company's importance, so it was speedily deleted. After your block expires, I am willing to help you on the article, if you can show that the company is in some way notable. Edit warring to keep the article, though, is not acceptable.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:20, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]