User talk:Maestro.gandhi

Welcome!

Hello, Maestro.gandhi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Mailer Diablo 16:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maestro.gandhi! I really like your contributions to Wikipedia, especially the recent Symphony No. 2 (Mahler) page. Good job. -- A. Wang ^{(talk/contrb.)} 19:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Augmented sixths

Thanks for your note, Maestro. We try!

– Noetica^♬♩ Talk 22:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cadential 6/4 fallacy

Hi, I notice that you chimed in at the Augmented 6th page about the rationality of not referring to the cadential six-four as having a root of C (in the key of C), which, of course, defies the function of that vertical coincidence.

It's turned into a nasty edit war now at Inversion (music), and will soon go to mediation. Are you willing to support my line that the I 6/4 fallacy should not be privileged by being the sole illustration of the cadential 6/4, but should either be matched with another illustration or removed completely? There's been a half-hearted attempt to tip hats at the proper way of analysing it, in the main text, but I maintain that the privilege of an illustration should not be confined to one side. Tony 03:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, I have no software with which to create such an illustration. I think it's improper that the POV should remain privileged in an illustration until it is sorted out. Tony 15:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that would be very nice of you! I can easily tweak the text (a mention of both, with a footnote explaining each approach?). Tony 00:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]