User talk:Magnusmit

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Daniel Risacher, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. shares almost identical user name with subject's email address Kudpung (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, minimal detail about only the most notable alumni is given. Your addition appears to give undue weight to a comparatively minor alumnus. If you think he should be listed in the article, you will need to explain why at Talk:Massachusetts Institute of Technology—especially if you think he needs such an unusual length of coverage in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ElKevbo (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Risacher

The article Daniel Risacher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. No significant coverage. Fails WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Daniel Risacher

I have nominated Daniel Risacher, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Risacher. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:46, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]